EMF Waves and Pulses Release Mercury From Dental Amalgam

Increased Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Restorations After Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields as a Potential Hazard for Hypersensitive People and Pregnant Women

"Based on these findings, as infants and children are more vulnerable to mercury exposures, and as some individuals are routinely exposed to different sources of electromagnetic fields, we possibly need a paradigm shift in evaluating the health effects of amalgam fillings."

Increased mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after exposure to electromagnetic fields as a potential hazard for hypersensitive people and pregnant women

Citation Information: Reviews on Environmental Health. ISSN (Online) 2191-0308, ISSN (Print) 0048-7554,DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0017, November 2015

Ghazal Mortazavi1 / S.M.J. Mortazavi2, 3

1Tangestan Health Network, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran

2Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3Medical Physics and Medical Engineering Department, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Corresponding author: Professor S.M.J. Mortazavi, PhD, Medical Physics and Medical Engineering Department, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, Phone: +98-711-2349332, Fax: +98-711-2349332/+98-711-2289113, E-mail: (email); and Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Publication History
Received:2015-07-12Accepted:2015-10-03Published Online:2015-11-06

Abstract

Over the past decades, the use of common sources of electromagnetic fields such as Wi-Fi routers and mobile phones has been increased enormously all over the world. There is ongoing concern that exposure to electromagnetic fields can lead to adverse health effects. It has recently been shown that even low doses of mercury are capable of causing toxicity. Therefore, efforts are initiated to phase down or eliminate the use of mercury amalgam in dental restorations. Increased release of mercury from dental amalgam restorations after exposure to electromagnetic fields such as those generated by MRI and mobile phones has been reported by our team and other researchers. We have recently shown that some of the papers which reported no increased release of mercury after MRI, may have some methodological errors. Although it was previously believed that the amount of mercury released from dental amalgam cannot be hazardous, new findings indicate that mercury, even at low doses, may cause toxicity. Based on recent epidemiological findings, it can be claimed that the safety of mercury released from dental amalgam fillings is questionable. Therefore, as some individuals tend to be hypersensitive to the toxic effects of mercury, regulatory authorities should re-assess the safety of exposure to electromagnetic fields in individuals with amalgam restorations. On the other hand, we have reported that increased mercury release after exposure to electromagnetic fields may be risky for the pregnant women. It is worth mentioning that as a strong positive correlation between maternal and cord blood mercury levels has been found in some studies, our findings regarding the effect of exposure to electromagnetic fields on the release of mercury from dental amalgam fillings lead us to this conclusion that pregnant women with dental amalgam fillings should limit their exposure to electromagnetic fields to prevent toxic effects of mercury in their fetuses. Based on these findings, as infants and children are more vulnerable to mercury exposures, and as some individuals are routinely exposed to different sources of electromagnetic fields, we possibly need a paradigm shift in evaluating the health effects of amalgam fillings.

http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.ahead-of-print/reveh-2015-0017/reveh-2015-0017.xml?format=INT

Mercury Poisoned Lunatics

Levels of institutionalization for insanity are undeniably low compared to the 1950's.  Rhode Island has only 2% of those committed to institutions, that's a 98% drop accounting for population growth.


Why the difference?

In the 1950's the U.S. Government ordered the pharmaceutical industry to stop Direct-To-Consumer advertising.  The healthcare industry had become incredibly successful hooking the general populace on their mercury products.  Mercury can initially alleviate conditions that it causes, and then it comes back with a vengeance.  This is the history of Calomel in the Unites States of America going back to the early 1700's. 

The industry has lowered the dose of neurotoxins it doles out, but the number of doses of childhood vaccinations have skyrocketed.  We also can't dismiss other sources of mercury poisoning.  Mercury dental amalgams are the rule for those using social services, even for little children.  Add to this mercury from the following:

Today, in 20% of chlor-alkali plants across the United States, we still use the antiquated mercury cell Castner-Kellner process.  Rather than have the mercury be poured into the local water supply, these companies let their residual mercury contaminate the following products, caustic soda and chlorine.

Caustic soda is used to make the following products:
High Fructose Corn Syrup

Corn Syrup

Milled corn products

http://grist.org/article/some-heavy-metal-with-that-sweet-roll/

Chlorine is the other major product from this process.  After a heavy rain that extra-chlorinated smell from your municipal water supply means the company has added a good dose of chlorine, and it may be tainted with mercury.

Chlorine is also used to make bleach.  Clorox is a safe bleach to use because they do not use the Castner-Kellner process.  Many others are questionable.  http://factsaboutbleach.com/mercuryqa.htm

Bleached products like paper towels, napkins, plates, etc.

http://www.nrdc.org/land/forests/tissueguide/ratings.aspx

Chlorine is where the

If we keep adding mercury back into our bodies at current rates, we are going to have a lot more than 1 in 64 people rating simply autistic.  We only have to look at Adam Lanza's Sandy Hook Massacre, or James Eagen Holmes's orchestrated tear gas and shooting spree during a midnight screening of The Dark Knight to see a rising insanity, like a tide we can't turn back.

DUMB POLIO POLICIES

These words excerpted from Jason Beaubien's NPR article Hg151110.  My comments are in BOLD UPPERCASE.

The Oral Polio Vaccine Can Go 'Feral,' But WHO Vows to Tame It

The number of vaccine-derived polio cases relative to the

hundreds of millions

of doses of oral polio vaccine administered each year is incredibly low. In 2014, there were 56 vaccine-derived cases reported globally. But 56 starts to sound like a lot when the number of regular polio cases has fallen to just a couple dozen a year.  SCHEMING, MANIPULATING THE NUMBERS, CONSPIRING

INCREDIBLY DUMB TO CHANGE THE FORMULA WITH THIS LEVEL OF SUCCESS

So last month the World Health Organization announced the beginning of a program to phase out oral polio vaccine and eventually switch to the injectable version, which contains no live virus.

THE ONLY REASON TO DO SO WOULD BE TO MAKE MORE MONEY

WHO is ordering every country still using oral polio vaccine to switch to a safer oral vaccine in April 2016. The first step in the WHO plan is to drop Type 2 polio virus from the new oral vaccine. Of the three types of virus in the vaccine, Type 2 accounts for roughly 90 percent of vaccine-derived paralysis cases. Type 2 itself has not been seen in the wild since 1999.

WHY CONTINUE VACCINATING FOR A VIRUS THAT NO LONGER EXISTS?  IF CASES APPEAR, WE CAN FLY VACCINES AROUND THE WORLD WITHIN MINUTES .

The Original Article Is Here

Vaccine Immunology World Health Organization Report

“To generate vaccine-mediated protection is a complex challenge.  Currently
available vaccines have largely been developed empirically, with little or no
understanding on how they activate the immune system. Their early protective efficacy is primarily conferred by the induction of antigen-specific anti-bodies.” 

This is a quote from the first paragraph of a report, Vaccine Immunology, by the World Health Organization!

Empirical evidence concerns observation or experience, rather than theory or pure logic.  This means that what many people are calling science is actually statistics. Scientists count the results and make a determination, a judgment, as to whether a vaccine is effective.

We do understand an injection with a ‘dead’ piece of virus and an adjuvant like mercury or aluminum creates an autoimmune response.  An organism won't have a reaction without the neurotoxin involved because the virus is dead. However, not every
human reacts the same way to a neurotoxin being injected into his or her veins.


Human activity has distributed many toxins throughout the world and our local environments.  We need to take into account an individual’s current health status, and toxic load, before administering a vaccination with additional toxins.  The WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION clearly states we have “little or no understanding on how they (vaccines) activate the immune system.”

There is a long history of mercury poisoning in modern medicine.  As recently as the 1950’s the pharmaceutical industry was ordered to stop poisoning so many people with mercury and calomel.  (Calomel is a mercury compound.)  Today, the doses of mercury have been reduced, people aren’t normally falling over dead from one injection, but the level of health care problems requiring prescription drugs has skyrocketed.  However, the same companies that are doling out the vaccines are the ones benefiting from the healthcare industry's newly named ancillary diseases.  These aren't new diseases, they are simply new names for cases of toxic poisoning, primarily mercury.

Let’s work together to make sure everyone is safe to receive a vaccine before the vaccine is administered.

Who Is Eli Lilly?  http://www.mercuryfreekids.org/eli-lilly/

http://www.who.int/immunization/documents/Elsevier_Vaccine_immunology.pdf

Vaccine Safety

“To generate vaccine-mediated protection is a complex challenge. Currently available vaccines have largely been developed empirically, with little or no understanding on how they activate the immune system. Their early protective efficacy is primarily conferred by the induction of antigen-specific anti-bodies.”    This is a quote from a World Health Organization 20 page report on vaccines:  http://www.who.int/immunization/documents/Elsevier_Vaccine_immunology.pdf

Empirical evidence is concerned with observation or experience, rather than theory or pure logic. This means that what many people are calling science is actually statistics.  Scientists count the results and make a determination, a judgment, as to whether a vaccine is effective.

We do understand an injection with a ‘dead’ piece of virus and an adjuvant like mercury or aluminum creates an autoimmune response. An organism won't have a reaction without the neurotoxin involved because the virus is dead. However, not every human reacts the same way to a neurotoxin being injected into his or her veins.


Human activity has distributed many toxins throughout the world and our local environments. I believe that we should take into account genetics, current health status, and an individual’s current toxic load before adding more toxins into a human body.  

There is a long history of mercury poisoning in modern medicine. As recently as the 1950’s the pharmaceutical industry was ordered to stop poisoning so many people with mercury and calomel.  (Calomel is a mercury compound)  See http://www.mercuryfreekids.org/eli-lilly/

Let’s work together to make sure everyone is safe to receive a vaccine before the vaccine is administered.